The part is chosen in the schematic. In this stage for 60 days · 50% default win probability.
Rank 1 of 3 eligible devices in our scoring of public specs. Strongest factor: spec fit — compute matches (6x 500 MHz) · 20 MB flash / 10 MB SRAM against 20 MB / 6.1 MB typical for this compute class (proxy) · I/O capacity — CAN-FD 24, CAN-XL 24, ETHERNET 5000 vs 1000 required
Rank 2 of 3 eligible devices in our scoring of public specs. Strongest factor: requirement coverage — 5 met, 0 to verify, 1 not met of 6 checkable requirements (tier-weighted).
Rank 3 of 3 eligible devices in our scoring of public specs. Strongest factor: spec fit — compute matches (5x 400 MHz) · 20 MB flash / 6.1 MB SRAM against 20 MB / 6.1 MB typical for this compute class (proxy)
Opportunity Scorer index for TC4Dx · Europe · Zonal E/E architecture. Illustrative, from public positioning — not a forecast.
TC4Dx is positioned specifically for Zonal E/E architecture. A high cost tier (proxy) against medium price sensitivity gives a price fit of 60%. Medium competitive pressure keeps 85% of that.
Positioned specifically for Zonal E/E architecture; illustrative Zonal E/E architecture demand in Europe is high.
From very-high compute class (proxy), zonal/domain positioning (transceiver and power-supply content). No internal attach-rate data.
Complexity from very-high compute class, leading-edge generation and a PPU toolchain: easier to support means fewer FAE hours per design-in.
Leading-edge generation (TC4x). Zonal E/E architecture programs start new architectures, so production runway weighs heavily.
Schematic review with Lena's team
Overdue · 31 days ago
You
Shared the compliance matrix export from RFQ Qualification.
Walked through backbone bandwidth and the power-distribution safety concept.
Front-left and front-right zone controllers for the NW-E2 platform: 1000BASE-T1 backbone, many CAN-FD and LIN legs, ASIL-D power distribution, secure OTA.